Then there is another 1.5 million under their retirement insurance insurance program CalPERS. There are 212,000 full-time employees in the state under this program, as well as dependents. “But that still might be too big, so the safest option would be to just have Walgreens out on state employee insurance plans. And remember, not going to the store for medication can change buying habits too, meaning other purchases usually made there will go to places like CVS instead.” That’s millions of customers lost overnight, and even with only a third of those people getting prescriptions from Walgreens, can cost a lot of money. Theoretically the largest stoppage he could do is stop all Medi-Cal recipients to buy medication through Walgreens. “Now there has been a lot of talk about people on state plans, and that is the most likely scenario here. Same with if he tries to ban all insurance in California for accepting Walgreens. All that can be easily challenged in court anyway. Nor will he put big restrictions on Walgreens in general to entice people not to shop there. “California will not order all Walgreens to leave the state. “I think we can rule out some scenarios off the bat,” explained Roger Springer, a former executive with two companies that helped negotiate contracts with local and county governments, to the Globe on Tuesday. So what could be coming up? What could it do to Walgreens? And could it do to the average Californian. “Walgreens’ business would be severely limited by changes to state insurance plans,” noted Dang. The few people connected with the situation who did speak, such as California Pharmacists Association president Richard Dang, only said somewhat vague remarks with a hint that Newsom could be going after state insurance plans. However, this did little to help, with no follow-up announcements on Tuesday. We will not pursue business with companies that cave to right wing bullies pushing their extremist agenda or companies that put politics above the health of women and girls.” Newsom’s office attempted to clarify what it meant later that day by adding “California is reviewing all relationships between Walgreens and the state. The initial announcement brought confusion for many, as no one was sure what that meant. We’re done.”Ĭalifornia won't be doing business with - or any company that cowers to the extremists and puts women's lives at risk. A day after Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the state will “no longer do business” with the pharmacy chain Walgreens, the Globe looks at what the state could possibly announce and what it could mean for all parties involved.įollowing Walgreens decision last week to no longer sell abortion pills in the 20 states where they are illegal at the state level due to a threatened lawsuit, Governor Newsom fired back by tweeting out “ California won’t be doing business with Walgreens or any company that cowers to the extremists and puts women’s lives at risk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |